<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Moves Away from Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: luminog</title>
		<link>http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>luminog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Ted believes my publishing approach is not going into it enough and said:

I think it&#039;s deeper than that.  The public, and publishers,
 and executives everywhere, have believed what the tekkies
 told them.  The package delivered by PARC (which I call
 the PUI, or PARC user interface, and others call the
 Modern GUI) turned the computer into a paper simulator
 and &quot;desktop&quot; because
 - Xerox was a paper-walloping company, could only think
  in those terms
 - the abstraction of &quot;desktop&quot; and &quot;folders&quot; was not for
  the man in the street, as they claimed, but for Xerox
  upper management, who were clueless (I have this confirmed)
 - Bob Taylor, head of PARC, needed to please his bosses
 - Taylor, long on organization but short on imagination,
  accepted (and selected) what the lads presented him.

Chuck Simonyi (with Bravo, later called Microsoft Word)
 and John Warnock (with Interpress, which became Adobe)
 were only bricks in this facade.

However, I am still trying to find out why they kept point sizes--
 wouldn&#039;t you like to increase things by a percentage?
 My suspicion is that Warnock wanted to make an alliance
 with the type foundries to build his empire.

----------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted believes my publishing approach is not going into it enough and said:</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s deeper than that.  The public, and publishers,<br />
 and executives everywhere, have believed what the tekkies<br />
 told them.  The package delivered by PARC (which I call<br />
 the PUI, or PARC user interface, and others call the<br />
 Modern GUI) turned the computer into a paper simulator<br />
 and &#8220;desktop&#8221; because<br />
 &#8211; Xerox was a paper-walloping company, could only think<br />
  in those terms<br />
 &#8211; the abstraction of &#8220;desktop&#8221; and &#8220;folders&#8221; was not for<br />
  the man in the street, as they claimed, but for Xerox<br />
  upper management, who were clueless (I have this confirmed)<br />
 &#8211; Bob Taylor, head of PARC, needed to please his bosses<br />
 &#8211; Taylor, long on organization but short on imagination,<br />
  accepted (and selected) what the lads presented him.</p>
<p>Chuck Simonyi (with Bravo, later called Microsoft Word)<br />
 and John Warnock (with Interpress, which became Adobe)<br />
 were only bricks in this facade.</p>
<p>However, I am still trying to find out why they kept point sizes&#8211;<br />
 wouldn&#8217;t you like to increase things by a percentage?<br />
 My suspicion is that Warnock wanted to make an alliance<br />
 with the type foundries to build his empire.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mprove</title>
		<link>http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>mprove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>That was kind of fun when I approached Ted Nelson with a PDF version of his books. He replied, &quot;I am extremely prejudiced against PDF and want nothing to do with it.&quot;

Further recommended webwatching (1h30 at U of Oxford):
 http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/?view=Webcast&amp;ID=20051121_112

cheers,
Matthias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was kind of fun when I approached Ted Nelson with a PDF version of his books. He replied, &#8220;I am extremely prejudiced against PDF and want nothing to do with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Further recommended webwatching (1h30 at U of Oxford):<br />
 <a href="http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/?view=Webcast&amp;ID=20051121_112" rel="nofollow">http://webcast.oii.ox.ac.uk/?view=Webcast&amp;ID=20051121_112</a></p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Matthias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luminog</title>
		<link>http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>luminog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Glad someone agrees. We should stop using the format, force them to change their ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad someone agrees. We should stop using the format, force them to change their ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Tule</title>
		<link>http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Tule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luminog.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/adobe-skews-away-from-print/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Right on! For years Adobe has been churning out these unreadable pages online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on! For years Adobe has been churning out these unreadable pages online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
